We must hasten the defeat of aging. Encourage people you know to read the book Ending Aging by Aubrey de Grey, and also donate money to SENS Research Foundation and Life Extension Advocacy Foundation.
Tuesday, November 27, 2018
Sunday, November 25, 2018
Limitless Peace Manifesto 2018
We must defeat aging. We must implement basic income. We must outlaw psychiatric coercion.
See through illusions.
Read the book Ending Aging by Aubrey de Grey and Michael Rae. Read books that psychiatrist Thomas Szasz wrote.
Donate money to SENS Research Foundation and Life Extension Advocacy Foundation.
Donate money to People’s Currency Foundation.
Practice Aikido, Judo, Taichi, Qigong, or Yoga. Go to a gym. Eat healthy food. Be authentically peaceful.
Bless up!
See through illusions.
Read the book Ending Aging by Aubrey de Grey and Michael Rae. Read books that psychiatrist Thomas Szasz wrote.
Donate money to SENS Research Foundation and Life Extension Advocacy Foundation.
Donate money to People’s Currency Foundation.
Practice Aikido, Judo, Taichi, Qigong, or Yoga. Go to a gym. Eat healthy food. Be authentically peaceful.
Bless up!
Saturday, November 24, 2018
Outlaw Psychiatric Coercion
An adult who wants to engage in suicide only needs to be hospitalized if they want to be hospitalized. Nonconsensual psychiatry and psychiatric coercion should be illegal. Read the book Suicide Prohibition: The Shame of Medicine by psychiatrist Thomas Szasz. Only consensual psychiatry should be legal. Individuals who want to engage in suicide have reasons for wanting to engage in suicide. To purely medicalize suicide is dehumanizing. It will be good if we can reduce suicides to zero using persuasion, reason, and kindness. Psychiatric coercion has a chilling effect on free speech; it prevents adults from being able to have open and honest conversations about suicide in private settings without fear of potentially being effectively jailed in a hospital against their own will. People who want help should be offered help in solving problems in living contributing to emotional distress. Adults who do not want help should be able to exercise the right to be left alone.
Tuesday, November 20, 2018
Thursday, November 8, 2018
Will DAO’s That Tokenize Dividends Become Ubiquitous?
Cryptocurrencies have enabled the creation and establishment of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAO’s). DAO’s can effectively be a new form of business and organization that is easy to be a part of and mutually benefit from. They also have the potential to benefit many members of society and transform society. Organizations are groups of people cooperating together to achieve some small, medium, large, or monumental goal, purpose, or task. There can be nearly an infinite number of potential DAO’s.
Are outdated and now unjust laws related to securities harming the potential future of cryptocurrency and blockchain adoption, and also harming the potential for a future of increased abundance and prosperity for all of humanity?
Are many laws related to securities that are preventing non-accredited investors from purchasing tokenized assets unconstitutional? Could parts of our US Constitution about free speech and freedom of association apply here?
Can decentralized autonomous organizations (DAO's) that provide useful goods and services to consumers and then provide dividends back to many stakeholders (accredited and non-accredited) legally exist? DAO's like this should be able to exist.
What do you think? Are there any lawyers that could attempt to fairly and justly utilize the judicial system to enable peaceful groups of people to tokenize assets and businesses in a way that is nearly frictionless to affiliate, participate, and associate with?
Will DAO's that deliver dividends to many stakeholders become common and ubiquitous in 5 years? 10 years?
Are outdated and now unjust laws related to securities harming the potential future of cryptocurrency and blockchain adoption, and also harming the potential for a future of increased abundance and prosperity for all of humanity?
Are many laws related to securities that are preventing non-accredited investors from purchasing tokenized assets unconstitutional? Could parts of our US Constitution about free speech and freedom of association apply here?
Can decentralized autonomous organizations (DAO's) that provide useful goods and services to consumers and then provide dividends back to many stakeholders (accredited and non-accredited) legally exist? DAO's like this should be able to exist.
What do you think? Are there any lawyers that could attempt to fairly and justly utilize the judicial system to enable peaceful groups of people to tokenize assets and businesses in a way that is nearly frictionless to affiliate, participate, and associate with?
Will DAO's that deliver dividends to many stakeholders become common and ubiquitous in 5 years? 10 years?